WALL of SHAME (WOS)

Lawfully exposing NSW Government strategies and Officers that use tax payers monies to willfully cause psychological
harm and financial loss to constituents of NSW by comprehensively analysing NSW Caselaw decisions

Table-01-Agency Strategies-and-Conduct

Type-IDType-DESCRIPTION
01Agency cover-ups to the detriment of NSW Constituents
02Obstructing departmental accountability
03Abusing positions of power to influence outcomes contrary to legislation, processes and procedures
04Mismanagement of formal complaints to conceal agency wrongdoing
05Willfully breaching codes of conduct
06Weaponising NSW Police for self-serving purposes to harass and intimidate members of the public for exercising their legal rights
07Misleading NCAT members during proceedings in confidential sessions to withhold incriminating evidence
08Making untruthful submissions to commissions to unlawfully promote legislative changes to benefit agencies
09Deliberately making defective GIPA decisions resulting in forced NCAT merit reviews
10Submitting falsified statutory declarations and affidavits in legal proceedings
11Grossly defective NCAT decisions to protect the conduct of NSW Government agencies
12Engaging in malicious prosecutions by abusing legal process for suppression
13Retaining external lawyers in attempts to obtain unlawful legal costs in (GIPA, PIPPA & HRIPA) matters during NCAT proceedings
14Official NCAT sound recording malfunctions, transcript tampering and poor sound quality to whitewash scrupulous agency behaviour
15Using the WHS Act 2011 (NSW) based on false allegations to prevent constituents contacting agencies by phone or email, rather they must use Australia Post
16NSW Department of Justice (DCJ) appointing an Ad-Litum's to sabotage and shutdown Applicant proceedings
17NCAT Appeal Panel remit matters to a newly constituted Tribunal where the Member is subordinate to the original decision maker
18NCAT hold confidential hearings for Agency's that prevent the opposing party to cross examine the evidence to the detriment of that excluded party. A significant prejudice then arises
19Agencies make defective decisions to facilitate an S(110) application under the GIPA Act 2009
20NCAT make defective decisions that set precedents for other NSW Agencies to rely on when responding to GIPA Access Applications
21Rogue NCAT Members frequently make defective decisions against Self-Litigants
22NCAT unlawfully appoints a Guardian ad Litum (GAL) to shutdown Self-Representative parties that expose Agency corruption and wrongdoing

Table-02-WOS-Entries

WOS-IDWOS-NAMEWOS-ALIASWOS-CERTIFICATEWOS-RAP-SHEETWOS-BRIEF-OF-EVIDENCE
WOS-000-001 Ms ***** ****** (redacted)The fixated PerpetratorMembers OnlyMembers OnlyMembers Only
WOS-000-002Ms ********* **** (redacted)The legal ManipulatorMembers OnlyMembers OnlyMembers Only
WOS-000-003Ms ***** ********* (redacted)The failed SpoliatorMembers OnlyMembers OnlyMembers Only
WOS-000-004Mr *** ****** (redacted)The loyal AccompliceMembers OnlyMembers OnlyMembers Only
WOS-000-005Ms *** ********* (redacted)The unqualified ReginaMembers OnlyMembers OnlyMembers Only

This website is under construction including the members section

*** DISCLAIMER ***

In the spirit of open government and transparency, all legal threats which include but not limited to the following (Cease & Desist, Concerns, Contempt of Court or NSW Police) notices and or cautions will be
published on the legal threats page of this website. To ensure prompt consideration and reply from the website owner's legal representative, all legal threats must be emailed to (legal@furiosotoro.red). A response
will then be provided within (10) business days.

~~ Failure is simply the opportunity to begin again, this time more intelligently - (Henry Ford) ~~

~~ Developed and Administered by GETEM Solutions ~~

Copyright © All rights reserved.